Rules are meant to be broken?
Rules are organizational devices created by people, usually in the past, to control human behavior to support their goals. — Unknown
First of all, let’s play a game, but you MUST follow few very simple steps: place your right hand over your heart, close your eyes, take a real deep breath, then ask yourself, “Have you ever bent or broken any rules?”
Okay now, I suppose the question above did flash through your mind for a moment, yet the interesting part is, how many of the readers actually follow the “game rule” as stated? For those who really follow, I appreciate your sincerity in reading my blog; for those who don’t, gotcha! You’ve just been the subject of this topic.
Just a little joke made but I daresay, all of us break rules, minor or major, intentionally or not. … Some rules are valid and must be enforced in order to hold people within the ethical boundaries. Some rules are simply stupid just like the game rule above (another good place to find plenty of stupid rules is MMU). But, is it wrong to break rules? Not necessary. So long one is willing to accept the consequences of his action; so long his action does not harm the others. Well, IMHO, it is fine to break rules.
The existence of rules is merely impossible to be the best of both worlds. While the rules are created to support certain party’s goals, they are broken for the interests of the other party.
One night I was chatting with a friend regarding the blog assignment rules, she told me that a lot of students actually fail to meet the requirement by posting once a week (ermm that includes me). Well she makes a good role model who really posts once a week punctually (exactly a gap of 7 days), and she has got 8 posts currently. She questioned why can’t people just follow what is required to. That’s a good question that inspires me to write about the rebellious nature of human beings.
Humans are born rebellious
Humans are inherent with rebellious nature. I believe all of us have experienced it in ourselves and have observed it in others. Take speeding. If the speed limit on the highways is 55 mph, people are not generally satisfied until they are driving 60. One would surely think that such people would be exceptionally content to drive at 70, and indeed they will, until the speed limit is moved to 70, then happiness will not be found at any speed less than 75. It seems that there is no contentment in perfect compliance with the law.
Such nature is especially observable in children and teenagers. Tell a child not to open a particular drawer, even though the child may not have prior intention to do so, temptation to open the drawer arises naturally once the command is given. Does it sound familiar to you? Since we were young, we have been warned and commanded many times about the “don’ts”, “can’t”, “musts”, “wrongs” and etc.. They act like constraints to our freedom in life. At times we are whispering within ourselves, “Why can’t I do this?”, “Why must I do that?”, “What if… I don’t?”. More questions arise as we grow up, have gained autonomy and developed our own world model. We have learned reasoning, and we make our rebellious behavior more reasonable.
At times we are risking ourselves on the borderline between do and don’t, right and wrong, even though we are aware of the potential dangers behind. That’s the beauty of temptation. It is always the discontentment of human beings that leads us to the struggle between our ethics awareness and our rebellious nature. In the end, we either manage to hold our curiosity and desire back, or indulge ourselves in them, which probably let ourselves be consumed by regret and guilt later.
